Prospective cohort study shows no significant cfDNA differences in COVID patients, suggesting alternative hospitalization criteria are needed.
Background Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a relevant biomarker reflecting disease severity in hospitalised COVID-19 patients, correlating with respiratory failure and mortality. However, its utility has not yet been evaluated in general practitioner setting. Methods A prospective single-centre, two-arm, parallel, longitudinal cohort study conducted in a German general practice with four doctors between 8/2021 and 4/2022. Participants : Sixty-one outpatients with flu-like symptoms participated: 31 (10 men, 21 women) tested SARS-CoV-2 positive (COVID group); 30 (12 men, 18 women) were controls (control group). The groups were demographically similar. Primary outcome measures : Comparison of cfDNA levels between groups at day 0, 7 and 14. Secondary outcome measures : Correlations between cfDNA levels and laboratory and clinical parameters like blood counts, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation. Results cfDNA levels did not differ significantly between groups (F [1, 59] = 1.538, p = 0.22): day 0: mean (± standard deviation) = 14.45 (± 6.24) ng/ml (COVID group) vs. 11.32 (± 4.79) ng/ml (control group); day 7: 14.46 (± 6.57) ng/ml vs. 12.53 (± 6.67) ng/ml; day 14: 12.94 (± 6.66) ng/ml vs. 12.93 (± 7.02) ng/ml. However, at t0, the integrity index was significantly lower in the COVID group (t0: 0.30 [±- 0.15] vs. 0.41 [± 0.1]; p = 0.0127) increasing at t1 (0.38 [± 0.17]; p = 0.008) and at t2 (0.42 [± 0.22]; p < 0.001). Conclusion Unlike hospitalised patients, cfDNA levels did not differ significantly between outpatient groups. Therefore, a decision on the need for hospitalisation based on clinical and serological factors is still required. The significantly lower integrity index of the SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals indicates that their DNA kinetics differ from those of individuals infected with other respiratory pathogens. Trial registration : German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024722, Registration date: 10 March 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enders et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: