Analysis demonstrates improved forecasting accuracy using deep learning in urban gas load scenarios, suggesting robust performance during cold waves.
Accurate short-term (10–20 days) natural gas load forecasting is crucial for the “tactical planning” of gas utilities, yet it faces significant challenges from high volatility, strong noise, and the high-dimensional multicollinearity of influencing factors. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel hybrid forecasting framework: PCCA-ISSA-GRU. The framework first employs Principal Component Correlation Analysis (PCCA), which improves upon traditional PCA by incorporating correlation analysis to effectively select orthogonal features most relevant to the load, resolving multicollinearity. Concurrently, an Improved Singular Spectrum Analysis utilizes statistical criteria (skewness and kurtosis) to adaptively separate signals from Gaussian noise, denoising the historical load sequence. Finally, the dually optimized data is fed into a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural network for prediction. Validated on real-world data from a large city in Northern China, the PCCA-ISSA-GRU model demonstrated superior performance. For a 20-day forecast horizon, it achieved a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 6.09%. Results show its accuracy is not only significantly better than single models (BPNN, LSTM, GRU) and classic hybrids (ARIMA-ANN), but also outperforms the state-of-the-art (SOTA) model, Informer, within the 10–20 days tactical window. This superiority was confirmed to be statistically significant by the Diebold–Mariano test (p < 0.05). More importantly, the model exhibited exceptional robustness, with its error increase during extreme weather scenarios (e.g., cold waves, rapid temperature changes) being substantially lower (+56.7%) than that of Informer (+109.2%). The PCCA-ISSA-GRU framework provides a high-precision, highly robust, and cost-effective solution for urban gas short-term load forecasting, offering significant practical value for critical operational decisions and high-risk scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enbin Liu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: