The diagnostic accuracy study demonstrates improved risk stratification in prostate cancer using mpMRI and maximum standardized uptake value metrics, indicating patient management improvements.
AbstractPrecise diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer (PCa) are essential for determining treatment strategies and predicting patient outcomes. This study is the first to integrate 18 F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-PSMA PET/CT) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for dual-parameter risk stratification in PCa, evaluating the noninvasive predictive value of 18 F-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in assessing PCa risk and Ki-67 expression, and providing a novel noninvasive diagnostic approach. We analyzed 84 PCa patients who underwent 18 F-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI before or after biopsy, assessing the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) from PET/CT and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC min ) from mpMRI. PCa risk was categorized using National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines based on clinical T-staging, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen, while Ki-67 expression was determined immunohistochemically. High-risk patients exhibited higher SUV max , SUV max /ADC min ratio, prostate-specific antigen, and Ki-67 positivity. The SUV max /ADC min ratio demonstrated the strongest predictive value (area under the curve = 0.832), while ADC min best predicted Ki-67 positivity (area under the curve = 0.719). Logistic regression confirmed that SUV max , ADC min , and SUV max /ADC min were significantly associated with PCa risk. The combined approach of 18 F-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI enhances PCa risk assessment and predicts Ki-67 expression, indicating potential for disease progression and metastasis. SUV max /ADC min is a key imaging parameter for evaluating tumor biology and may guide treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenfeng Shi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: