PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025British journal of surgery2 citations

Treatment strategies for Boerhaave syndrome: multinational retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper
LCLena‐Christin ConradiCGChristian A. GutschowCKCezanne D. Kooij

Key Points

  • Length of ICU stay averages 8 days across treatment groups, without significant differences noted.
  • Primary outcomes include in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality rates at 12%, reflecting treatment impact.
  • Multicentre retrospective analysis involved 216 patients treated for Boerhaave syndrome across 23 European tertiary centres.
  • Management strategies show variability, with combined treatment associated with longer hospital stays.

Abstract

Abstract Background Boerhaave syndrome is defined as a spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus. The mainstay of treatment is resuscitation of the patient, closure of the oesophageal defect, and drainage of perioesophageal and pleural fluid collections. Whether the optimal approach is endoscopic, surgical, or conservative management remains unknown and there are no clear guidelines. The aim of this multicentre retrospective cohort study was to evaluate current treatment strategies and outcomes for Boerhaave syndrome. Methods A multicentre retrospective analysis of data from 23 participating European tertiary centres was performed. Patients with Boerhaave syndrome treated between January 2019 and December 2023 were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the length of ICU stay and secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, 90-day mortality, and the length of overall hospital stay. Results In total, 216 patients were included; 151 were men (70%), the median age was 62 (22–95) years, and 81 (40%) were treated 24 h after the start of symptoms. Seventy (32%) patients were managed endoscopically (group I), 73 (34%) were managed surgically (group II), 67 (31%) were managed using a combination of endoscopy and surgery (group III), and 6 (3%) were managed using other methods (group IV). For patients in groups I–III: the median length of ICU stay was 8 (0–67) days, with no differences between the three groups (P = 0.105); the in-hospital mortality rate and 90-day mortality rate were both 12% (P = 0.490 and P = 0.637, respectively); and the median length of overall hospital stay was 27 (range 1–193) days, with the longest stays observed in patients who received combined treatment (P = 0.032). Conclusion This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current treatment strategies and outcomes for patients with Boerhaave syndrome in Europe.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Conradi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930e8bdea1aef094cca31e2https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf260
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment strategies for Boerhaave syndrome: multinational retrospective cohort study2025
  2. 2Multidisciplinary damage control strategy for Boerhaave’s syndrome: A case report2024
  3. 3A Conservative and Multidisciplinary Approach to Boerhaave Syndrome: A Case Report2024
  4. 4Successful multistage surgical management of Boerhaave syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.2026
  5. 5Surgical versus endoscopic management of Boerhaave’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis2026