Non-randomised trial finds digital prehabilitation improves continence in patients undergoing surgery, suggesting enhanced patient outcomes.
Objectives To test whether prehabilitation (PreHab), delivered digitally or as digital + on‐site, improves early continence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) vs no PreHab, and to evaluate implementation by quantifying programme uptake after transitioning from an on‐site programme to a digital pathway. Patients and Methods Two‐centre, high‐volume, non‐randomised before–after consecutive cohort over 3 years ( N = 350; Control = 204; PreHab = 146). PreHab combined pelvic floor muscle training, structured education, and optimisation via a smartphone pathway with or without a 1‐day class. Primary outcome: 6‐week continence (0–1 pad/day). Secondary outcomes: same‐day discharge (SDD), complications (Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥III), 30‐day unplanned visits and readmissions, postoperative physiotherapy, satisfaction (0–10 visual analogue scale), and continence at 6 and 12 months. Group comparisons used chi‐square/Fisher's and Mann–Whitney U ; multivariable logistic regression provided adjusted estimates. Results For the PreHab vs Control cohorts: 6‐week continence 84.2% vs 67.6% ( P = 0.003); SDD 47.3% vs 35.3% ( P = 0.025); high‐grade complications 2.1% vs 7.4% ( P < 0.001); mean (standard deviation) satisfaction score 9.4 (0.7) vs 8.4 (1.3) ( P < 0.001). Readmissions 3.4% vs 7.8% ( P = 0.086) and unplanned visits 3.4% vs 6.4% ( P = 0.218) were not different. Continence remained higher with PreHab at 6 months 97.7% vs 84.3% ( P < 0.001) and 12 months 99.2% vs 93.6% ( P = 0.004). Adjusted analyses showed lower odds of 6‐week incontinence (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.22–0.85; P = 0.015). Uptake rose from 26.6% (on‐site era) to 48.2% and 68.7% across successive digital periods ( P < 0.001). Effects did not differ by delivery mode. Conclusions Prehabilitation, regardless of delivery mode, improves early continence vs no PreHab without compromising safety; digitisation increased programme uptake, indicating that digital PreHab is an effective and scalable option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buhas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: