Experimental analysis shows optimized gaussian distribution improves energy deposition in gold nanoprisms, indicating potential for effective power absorption.
Passive and active targets, both implanted with gold nanoprisms, were designed to achieve enhanced, uniform power absorption during two-sided illumination with short laser pulses. The capabilities of uniform, single-peaked Gaussian and adjusted nanoresonator number density distributions were compared. The average local E-field inside the gain medium and at the nanoprism surface was mapped as a function of the pump E-field strength and dye concentration, and the optimal parameters were selected based on the achievable local E-field. A comparative study was performed on passive and active targets to determine the most favorable distribution type and to consider the advantages of dye doping. The adjusted distribution is proposed for both passive and active targets. Dye doping is advantageous in all distributions as it results in decreasing the minimal standard deviation of the near-field enhancement (NFE), the delay of the minimal standard deviation in the power loss and deposited energy, and the standard deviation of the NFE, while increasing the FOM of the NFE in the uniform and adjusted distributions. Dye doping allows for decreasing the delay of the minimal standard deviation in the NFE, increasing the mean NFE, and decreasing the standard deviation of the power loss and deposited energy in the uniform, Gaussian, and adjusted distribution, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vass et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: