Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 4, 2025Human Relations

Beyond good ideas: Strengthening theoretical contributions and methodological foundations of submissions for Human Relations

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YRYasin RofcanınZCZhijun ChenSASmriti Anand

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This editorial highlights enhancements to theoretical rigor and research design in quantitative submissions to Human Relations, suggesting significant improvements in scholarship.

Key Points

  • This editorial emphasizes the importance of theoretical and methodological rigor for impactful contributions in Human Relations.
  • Key recommendations focus on enhancing theoretical contributions and research design within submitted manuscripts.
  • The analysis draws on editorial experience and past publications to refine author submissions and improve coherence.
  • Overall, the aim is to foster integrative thinking around quantitative methods and the review process for quality submissions.

Cite This Study

Rofcanın et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930e8cdea1aef094cca37d4https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267251392802
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?2011 · 1,679 citations
  2. 2Too few or too many? Exploring the Link between gender dissimilarity and employee absenteeism2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Seeing others’ side to serve: Understanding how and when servant leadership impacts employee knowledge-hiding behaviors2022 · 88 citations
  4. 4What enables us to better experience our work as meaningful? The importance of awareness and the social context2022 · 59 citations
  5. 5Evaluation Research on Quality Circles: Technical and Analytical Implications1986 · 32 citations