Clinical trial demonstrates cell-mediated immunity and valganciclovir prophylaxis predict post-transplant CMV disease in adults, highlighting limited utility of QFT-CMV.
Background QuantiFERON-CMV (QFT-CMV) is a standardized assay for the evaluation of cytomegalovirus-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI). Objectives of this study were to assess the evolution of CMV-CMI post-transplant and the clinical utility of QFT-CMV for prediction of post-prophylaxis CMV disease in CMV-seronegative recipients of CMV-seropositive donor kidneys (D+R− KTRs). Methods 601 adult CMV D+R− KTRs received letermovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis for 28-weeks in a phase 3, double-blind, multicenter trial. QFT-CMV was performed at a central laboratory by masked personnel at transplant, 12, 28, and 52-weeks post-transplant. Investigators assessed CMV disease through week 52. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) at week 28 were used to evaluate clinical utility of QFT-CMV. Results Positive QFT-CMV results (pooled) were detected: baseline-1.2%, week 12-2.6%, week 28-7.7%, and week 52-28.9%. The distribution of positive results with letermovir and valganciclovir was comparable, except at week 28 (letermovir 2.2%, valganciclovir 12.8%). Post-prophylaxis CMV disease by week 52 occurred in 18.3% (84/460) of evaluable participants: 12.5% (4/32) of participants with a positive, 17.5% (66/377) with a negative, and 27.5% (14/51) with an indeterminate result at week 28 (p=not significant for all comparisons). QFT-CMV sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 8.3%, 94.3%, 87.5%, and 17.5%, and were similar when pooling indeterminate and negative results and within letermovir and valganciclovir study arms. Conclusions Among adult CMV high-risk D+R− KTRs who received prophylaxis, CMV-CMI by QFT-CMV increased over time. The result at the end of prophylaxis had limited clinical utility for identifying the risk for subsequent CMV disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Limaye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: