Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New CAP method enhances accuracy prediction in unseen data under prior probability shift, highlighting effective linear equations.
The standard technique for predicting the accuracy that a classifier will have on unseen data ( classifier accuracy prediction —CAP) is cross-validation (CV). However, CV relies on the assumption that the training data and the test data are sampled from the same distribution, an assumption that is often violated in many real-world scenarios. When such violations occur (i.e., in the presence of dataset shift ), the estimates returned by CV are unreliable. The contribution of this paper is three-fold. First, we propose a CAP method specifically designed to work under prior probability shift (PPS), an instance of dataset shift in which the training and test distributions are characterized by different class priors. This method estimates the n² entries of the contingency table of the test data (thus allowing to estimate the value of any specific evaluation measure) by solving a system of n² independent linear equations, with n the number of classes. Second, we show that the equations that the cells of the contingency table must satisfy are actually more than n² , which gives rise to an overconstrained problem, and present a family of methods each based on a different selection of n² such equations. Third, we observe that, since a key step of the above methods involves predicting the class priors of the test data, one can exploit intuitions from the field of class prior estimation (a.k.a. “quantification”). Our experiments show that, when combined with state-of-the-art quantification techniques, under PPS our methods tend to outperform existing CAP methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Volpi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: