Analysis demonstrates improved vibration measurement in industrial robots, suggesting non-contact methods enhance monitoring capabilities.
Accurate vibration measurement is crucial for maintaining the performance, reliability, and safety of automated manufacturing environments. Abnormal vibrations caused by faults in gears or bearings can degrade positional accuracy, reduce productivity, and, over time, significantly impair production efficiency and product quality. Such vibrations may also disrupt supply chains, cause financial losses, and pose safety risks to workers through collisions, falling objects, or other operational hazards. Conventional vibration measurement techniques, such as wired accelerometers and strain gauges, are typically limited to a few discrete measurement points. Achieving multi-point measurements requires numerous sensors, which increases installation complexity, wiring constraints, and setup time, making the process both time-consuming and costly. The integration of high-frame-rate (HFR) cameras with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) enables non-contact, multi-point, full-field vibration measurement of robot manipulators, effectively addressing these limitations. In this study, HFR cameras were employed to perform non-contact, full-field vibration measurements of industrial robots. The HFR camera recorded the robot’s vibrations at 1000 frames per second (fps), and the resulting video was decomposed into individual frames according to the frame rate. Each frame, with a resolution of 1920 × 1080 pixels, was divided into 128 × 128 pixel blocks with a 64-pixel stride, yielding 435 sub-images. This setup effectively simulates the operation of 435 virtual vibration sensors. By applying mask processing to these sub-images, nine key points representing critical robot components were selected for multi-point DIC displacement measurements, enabling effective assessment of vibration distribution and real-time vibration visualization across the entire manipulator. This approach allows simultaneous capture of displacements across all robot components without the need for physical sensors. The transfer function is defined in the frequency domain as the ratio between the output displacement of each robot component and the input excitation applied by the shaker mounted on the end-effector. The frequency–domain transfer functions were computed for multiple robot components, enabling accurate and full-field vibration analysis during operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abudoureheman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: