Analysis demonstrates how a trajectory prediction model classifies risk for pedestrians at intersections, suggesting improved intervention strategies.
Right-turning vehicles at intersections permitting right turn on red (RTOR) frequently conflict with pedestrians, posing significant safety risks. Existing studies often simplify vehicle trajectories by treating vehicles as centroid points, ignoring the spatial disparities between pedestrians and vehicles. To address this gap, we propose a conflict risk assessment framework based on front and rear wheel trajectories (FRWTs), which accounts for the dynamic differences in vehicle segments during turns. First, we partition vehicles into four segments (inner/outer and front/rear wheels) and develop a trajectory prediction model to quantify risk variations across these segments. Our analysis reveals that the inner front wheel poses the highest collision risk due to its speed, trajectory curvature, and pedestrian proximity. Next, we introduce three conflict interaction modes—hard interaction, no interaction, and soft interaction—and evaluate the applicability of conflict indicators (e.g., Time to Collision (TTC) and Post-Encroachment Time (PET)) under each mode. Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithm, we classify risk severity with high accuracy: 96% for hard interaction, 96% for no interaction, and 97% for soft interaction modes when TTC-PET dual indicators are employed. Our findings demonstrate that FRWT-based modeling significantly improves conflict risk assessment accuracy compared to centroid-point approaches. This work provides actionable insights for proactive traffic safety management and supports the development of targeted conflict mitigation strategies at RTOR intersections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: