Lattice QCD determines semileptonic decay rates in baryons, suggesting critical insights into fundamental interactions.
We present the first lattice QCD determination of the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi> <a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo> <a:mi>N</a:mi> </a:math> vector and axial-vector form factors, which are essential inputs for studying the semileptonic decay <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</e:mi> <e:mo stretchy="false">→</e:mo> <e:mi>p</e:mi> <e:mo>ℓ</e:mo> <e:msub> <e:mover accent="true"> <e:mi>ν</e:mi> <e:mo stretchy="false">¯</e:mo> </e:mover> <e:mo>ℓ</e:mo> </e:msub> </e:math> . This channel provides a clean, theoretically controlled avenue for extracting the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mo stretchy="false">|</k:mo> <k:msub> <k:mi>V</k:mi> <k:mrow> <k:mi>u</k:mi> <k:mi>s</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:msub> <k:mo stretchy="false">|</k:mo> </k:math> from the baryon sector. Our analysis uses a gauge ensemble with physical light, strange, and charm quark masses and yields the most precise determination to date of the full set of transition form factors—including second-class contributions—as well as the associated couplings, radii, and the ratio of muon-to-electron decay rates, an observable sensitive to possible nonstandard scalar and tensor interactions. We compare our nonperturbative results with next-to-next-to-leading order expansions in the small parameter <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:mrow> <o:mi>δ</o:mi> <o:mo>=</o:mo> <o:mo stretchy="false">(</o:mo> <o:msub> <o:mrow> <o:mi>m</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:msub> <o:mo>−</o:mo> <o:msub> <o:mrow> <o:mi>m</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mi>N</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:msub> <o:mo stretchy="false">)</o:mo> <o:mo>/</o:mo> <o:msub> <o:mrow> <o:mi>m</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:msub> <o:mo>≈</o:mo> <o:mn>0.16</o:mn> </o:mrow> </o:math> . We find that the common phenomenological approximation of neglecting the <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <u:msup> <u:mi>q</u:mi> <u:mn>2</u:mn> </u:msup> </u:math> dependence of the form factors leads to a <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <w:mo>∼</w:mo> <w:mn>4</w:mn> <w:mo>%</w:mo> </w:math> deviation in the decay rate. This underscores the critical importance of precise, fully nonperturbative form factor inputs for achieving the subpercent precision targets of upcoming experimental programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacchio et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: