PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 5, 2025Physical Review Letters4 citationsOpen Access

Study of the Λ → p ℓ ν ¯ ℓ Semileptonic Decay in Lattice QCD

View Full Paper
SBSimone BacchioAKAndreas Konstantinou

Key Points

  • Decay rate precision improved through lattice QCD analysis, addressing necessary inputs for future experiments.
  • The study presents the first determination of relevant form factors and matrix elements from lattice calculations.
  • Observational analysis using gauge ensembles with physical quark masses enhances the reliability of the findings.
  • Highlights the essential role of nonperturbative results in addressing decay rate and interaction precision targets.

Abstract

We present the first lattice QCD determination of the Λ → N vector and axial-vector form factors, which are essential inputs for studying the semileptonic decay Λ → p ℓ ν ¯ ℓ . This channel provides a clean, theoretically controlled avenue for extracting the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element | V u s | from the baryon sector. Our analysis uses a gauge ensemble with physical light, strange, and charm quark masses and yields the most precise determination to date of the full set of transition form factors—including second-class contributions—as well as the associated couplings, radii, and the ratio of muon-to-electron decay rates, an observable sensitive to possible nonstandard scalar and tensor interactions. We compare our nonperturbative results with next-to-next-to-leading order expansions in the small parameter δ = ( m Λ − m N ) / m Λ ≈ 0.16 . We find that the common phenomenological approximation of neglecting the q 2 dependence of the form factors leads to a ∼ 4 % deviation in the decay rate. This underscores the critical importance of precise, fully nonperturbative form factor inputs for achieving the subpercent precision targets of upcoming experimental programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bacchio et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6932311e8e51979591dce410https://doi.org/10.1103/bvs9-wcsj
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper