Framework focuses on interventions that enhance resilience and agency in clients facing career insecurity, implying long-term adaptability.
Purpose This paper aims to provide career development practitioners with a framework for understanding and addressing career insecurity. It emphasizes the role of resource-based interventions in fostering resilience, agency and sustainable career outcomes for clients navigating career insecurity. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on current research in career development, organizational behaviour and career resource theory, the paper outlines a practitioner-oriented approach. It combines theoretical insights with practical strategies for identifying career insecurity dimensions, assessing clients’ career resources and implementing targeted interventions. Findings Career insecurity is a multidimensional phenomenon influenced by individual, organizational and societal factors, including emerging technological trends (STARA: Smart Technology, AI, Robotics and Algorithms) and national regulations. Resource-focused interventions – protecting existing resources, replenishing depleted ones and building new, transferable capabilities – enable clients to act with greater agency and adaptability. This approach shifts the focus from short-term reassurance to sustainable, future-oriented career development. Practical implications Practitioners are provided with actionable guidance on assessing multidimensional career insecurity and fostering client resilience. By emphasizing resource development and long-term adaptability, the framework supports clients’ happiness, health and productivity in increasingly unpredictable work environments. Originality/value The paper integrates ethical considerations, contextual factors and technology-driven changes into a cohesive framework for practice. It highlights the often-overlooked complexity of career insecurity and the importance of equipping clients to navigate perceptions of career insecurity beyond organizational boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annabelle Hofer (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: