Comparative analysis shows photogrammetry improves DBH estimation in forest inventory, highlighting accessibility for sustainable practices.
Forestry is essential for environmental sustainability, biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, and renewable resource management. Traditional methods for forest inventory, particularly the manual measurement of diameter at breast height (DBH), are labor-intensive and prone to error. Recent advancements in proximal sensing, including lidar and photogrammetry, have paved the way for more efficient approaches, yet high costs remain a barrier to widespread adoption. This study investigates the potential of close-range photogrammetry (CRP) using low-cost devices, such as smartphones, cameras, and specialized handheld laser scanners (Stonex and LIVOX prototype), to generate 3D point clouds for accurate DBH estimation. We compared these devices by assessing their agreement and efficiency when compared to conventional methods in diverse forest conditions across multiple tree species. Additionally, we analyze factors influencing measurement errors and propose a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide technology selection in forest inventory. The results show that the lowest-cost devices and photogrammetric methods achieved the highest agreement with the conventional (caliper-based) measurements, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate. Photogrammetry provided the most accurate DBH estimates (error ≈ 0.7 cm) but required the highest effort; handheld laser scanners achieved an average accuracy of about 1.5 cm at substantially higher cost, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate (3–3.5 cm error). The outcomes of this research aim to facilitate more accessible, reliable, and sustainable forest management practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Výbošťok et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: