Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigation reveals ultrafine particle emissions during granite edge finishing, indicating health risks in stone processing.
Granite wet edge finishing is widely adopted to improve surface durability and aesthetics while reducing dust dispersion compared to dry processes. However, even under flooded lubrication, fine particles (FP, 0.5–20 µm) and ultrafine particles (UFP, <100 nm) containing crystalline silica are emitted, posing health risks such as silicosis and pulmonary or cardiovascular diseases. This study investigates particle emissions during CNC edge finishing of black (containing 0% quartz) and white granites (containing 41% quartz) using two industrially relevant profile tools: Half-Beveled (HB) and Ogee (OG). A full factorial design evaluated the effects of granite type, tool geometry, abrasive grit size, spindle speed, and feed rate. Particle concentrations were measured with Aerodynamic and Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers. Results show that spindle speed (N) is the dominant factor, explaining up to 92% of variance in emissions, whereas feed rate (Vf) played a minor role. Tool geometry had a pronounced effect on UFP release: sharp-edged geometries (HB) promoted localized micro-fracturing and higher emissions, while curved geometries (OG) distributed stresses and reduced particle detachment. White granite generated higher mass emissions due to its high quartz content, while black granite exhibited more stable emission behavior. These findings highlight the dual necessity of optimizing cutting kinematics and selecting appropriate tool profiles to balance surface quality and occupational health in granite processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mateur et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: