This investigation shows improved energy dissipation in hybrid fiber-reinforced composites, indicating enhanced tensile behavior.
Building structures are inherently susceptible to damage from extreme dynamic loads, while conventional concrete exhibits inadequate tensile resistance. While hybrid fibers systems can surpass the limitations of single-fiber reinforcement through their synergistic action, their internal damage mechanisms under impact loading remain inadequately understood. This study investigates the dynamic splitting behavior of hybrid fibers-reinforced cementitious composites combining polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with either steel (SF) or polyethylene (PE) fibers, using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) tests at strain rates of 5–31 s−1, along with industrial CT scanning for meso-scale damage analysis. Results indicate that the SF–PVA hybrid improved strength by up to 15.6% compared to mono-PVA, while the PE–PVA hybrid achieved an 11.1% increase. All hybrid systems exhibited improved energy dissipation (which rose 25–45% with strain rate) and displayed secondary stress peaks. Quantitative CT analysis revealed distinct damage patterns: the mono-PVA specimen developed extensive damage networks (porosity: 7.20%; crack ratio: 4.48%), the SF-PVA hybrid system displayed the lowest damage indices (porosity: 3.29%; crack ratio: 1.76%), whereas the PE-PVA hybrid system exhibited the most significant dispersed damage pattern (crack-to-pore ratio: 39.32%). The hybrid systems function via distinct mechanisms: SF–PVA offers multi-scale reinforcement and superior damage suppression, whereas PE–PVA enables sequential energy dissipation, effectively dispersing concentrated damage. These insights support tailored fiber hybridization for impact-resistant structural design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: