Analysis shows the impact of rake angle on the efficiency of manure injectors, suggesting improvements in environmental benefits.
This study integrates Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations, soil bin experiments, and multi-objective optimization to develop an energy-efficient manure injector shank. Eighteen geometries were first screened using DEM, reducing the set to six designs (S_1–S_6) based on draft force–rupture area performance. The selected designs, varying in rake angle (30°, 45°, 60°), thickness (25 and 30 mm), and width (102, 110, and 118 mm), were tested in a soil bin to measure draft, trench width, spoil cross-sectional area, and soil rupture. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among designs (p < 0.05), confirming that rake angle, width, and thickness have a strong influence on the soil–tool interaction. A multi-objective optimization framework was then used to minimize draft, trench width, and spoil area while maximizing rupture, with performance quantified through overall desirability values (0–1). Shank S_3 (45° rake, 25 mm thickness, 110 mm width) achieved the highest desirability (0.6676), representing the best trade-off between energy efficiency, minimal surface disturbance, and effective subsurface loosening. This integrated DEM–experimental–optimization approach demonstrates a reliable, data-driven workflow for implement design, reducing reliance on extensive field trials. However, future studies should validate the performance of S_3 and other candidate designs under diverse soil types, moisture levels, and operating conditions to confirm their agronomic and environmental benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew F. Digman (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: