Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study reveals that corticosteroid use and comorbidities increase serious infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients, suggesting improved risk assessment tools are needed.
Objectives To develop and validate a model to predict serious infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs), and to implement it as an interactive tool (RAISE). Methods We conducted a nationwide cohort study (2010–2023) using the French National Health Data System. Adults with RA initiating a b/tsDMARD were included. The primary outcome was a serious infection (i.e. requiring hospitalisation). Candidate predictors included demographics, treatment initiated, corticosteroid dose, prior infections, and comorbidities. Variable selection used LASSO, followed by a multivariable Cox model to estimate adjusted hazard ratios. The dataset was randomly split into a derivation cohort (66%) and a validation cohort (34%) for internal (hold-out) validation. In the derivation cohort, 500 bootstrap resamples were used to assess optimism-corrected performance. Model discrimination and calibration (6–24 months) were evaluated in both cohorts. No external validation was performed at this stage. Results Over median follow-up of 12.5 months (IQR 5.3–33.3), 4,657 and 2,359 serious infections occurred in derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Predictors included rituximab (aHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.98–2.44), infliximab (aHR 1.75, 1.56–1.97), corticosteroids ≥7.5 mg/day (aHR 1.45, 1.33–1.58), prior infection (aHR 1.62, 1.48–1.77), pulmonary disease (aHR 1.51, 1.40–1.64) and diabetes (aHR 1.34, 1.23–1.46); methotrexate was protective (aHR 0.81, 0.76–0.87). The model showed moderate discrimination (C-index 0.71) and calibration (mean absolute error ≤0.07). Conclusions RAISE delivers personalized 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month infection risk estimates using routinely available data, outperforming older tools in scope and relevance. It enables risk-based treatment planning and preventive strategies, with potential for international adoption following external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abboud et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: