Key result
Long cTnT improves MI discrimination over standard total cTnT, raising AUC to 0.83 vs 0.78.
Why the study?
Does measuring long cTnT improve the identification of myocardial infarction compared to total cTnT in emergency department patients with elevated total cTnT levels?
Population
1,811 consecutive emergency department patients with standard high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels…
Comparison
Measurement of intact and minimally fragmented… vs Standard high-sensitivity cTnT measurement
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Measuring long forms of cardiac troponin T provides superior discriminative ability for diagnosing myocardial infarction compared to standard total cTnT assays in patients with elevated troponin levels.
Observational (n=1,811)
Does measuring long cTnT improve the identification of myocardial infarction compared to total cTnT in emergency department patients with elevated total cTnT levels?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.833 (95% CI 0.804-0.863)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.833% vs 0.782%
p-value: p=<.001
Measuring long forms of cardiac troponin T provides superior discriminative ability for diagnosing myocardial infarction compared to standard total cTnT assays in patients with elevated troponin levels.
Airaksinen et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Elevated cardiac troponin levels / suspected myocardial infarction (n=1,811). Long cTnT assay vs. Total cTnT assay was evaluated on Identification of any myocardial infarction (AUC 0.833, 95% CI 0.804-0.863, p=<.001). Measuring long cTnT demonstrated superior discriminative ability compared to total cTnT for identifying any myocardial infarction (AUC 0.833 vs 0.782; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: