Randomized trial showed LIPUS improved pain symptoms in CP/CPPS, while tamsulosin enhanced quality of life, suggesting combination therapy may be effective.
Background Chronic prostatitis type IIIb/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) poses significant therapeutic challenges. This study aimed to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) versus tamsulosin for treating CP/CPPS. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 65 patients with CP/CPPS were allocated to two groups. Group A ( n = 35) received LIPUS treatment twice weekly, while Group B ( n = 30) received tamsulosin sustained-release capsules (0.2 mg, once nightly). The treatment duration was four weeks for all patients. Outcomes were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) at baseline and 4 weeks post-intervention. Results After 4 weeks, both groups showed significant improvements in all NIH-CPSI domains (pain, urinary, quality of life), SAS, and IIEF-5 scores compared to baseline (all P < 0.05). Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvement in pain symptoms than Group B ( P < 0.05), whereas Group B showed superior improvement in urinary symptoms compared to Group A ( P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for the remaining symptom domains ( P > 0.05). Conclusion Both LIPUS and tamsulosin significantly alleviated CP/CPPS-related symptoms with a favorable safety profile. LIPUS was more effective for pain relief, while tamsulosin was superior for urinary symptoms. Combination therapy may represent a promising approach for managing CP/CPPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke Liang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: