PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025npj Precision Oncology2 citationsOpen Access

Quantitative ultrasound imaging for predicting response and guiding personalized neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: randomized phase 2 clinical trial results

View Full Paper
DMDaniel Moore-PalharesLSLakshmanan SannachiJYJoanne Yip

Key Points

  • High response rates of 96.8% observed in the experimental arm targeting treatment adjustments.
  • Model achieved 92% accuracy, 93% specificity, and 83% sensitivity in predicting treatment responses.
  • Assessment includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy applied in a single-center randomized controlled trial environment.
  • Findings support integrating ultrasound-based machine learning for personalized breast cancer treatment approaches.

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) detects early tumor microstructural changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), enabling personalized treatment adaptation. This study assessed the accuracy of machine learning models using serial QUS data to predict treatment response and evaluated their feasibility for guiding treatment personalization. This single-center, phase 2 randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04050228, Dec/2019) enrolled stage II-III breast cancer patients planned for standard NAC. QUS imaging was performed at baseline and week 4, with the latter used for response prediction. Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard or experimental arms, stratified by hormone receptor status. In the standard arm, oncologists were blinded to QUS results. In the experimental arm, predictions were disclosed to allow treatment modification at week 4. Final response was determined histopathologically (>30% tumor reduction or <5% cellularity). Between June 2018 and September 2023, 146 patients were enrolled, and 120 randomized (standard: 57, experimental: 63). Response rates were 93.0% (standard) and 96.8% (experimental). The model achieved 92% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 99% positive predictive value. In the experimental arm, 8/63 patients were predicted non-responders, with 4 undergoing treatment modification. QUS-based machine learning enables accurate early response prediction and supports adaptive treatment strategies in future trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moore-Palhares et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624ad4fa91c937236c666https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01134-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantitative ultrasound radiomics guided adaptive neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: early results from a randomized feasibility study2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Textural Features for Image Classification1973 · 22,779 citations
  3. 3Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models2019 · 52 citations
  4. 4Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy2017 · 1,929 citations
  5. 5Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer2018 · 2,676 citations