Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 8, 2025Natural Resource ModelingOpen Access

Economic Trade‐Offs of Land Use Change and Wildlife Values

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JLJulian E. LozanoKEKatarina ElofssonJLJulian E. Lozano

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals trade-offs in land use impacting ecosystem services and wildlife management, suggesting policy implications.

Key Points

  • Increased game harvests from land use change may offset predator impacts, yet can incur net social costs.
  • Conversion of coniferous forests to broadleaves results in economic gains, balancing ecosystem services and hunting outcomes.
  • Dynamic spatial-lag model applied to evaluate land use and wildlife interactions, focusing on roe deer and predator populations.
  • Findings highlight the complex trade-offs in land use policies for effective wildlife and ecosystem management.

Cite This Study

Lozano et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624ad4fa91c937236c6d7https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.70018
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trading off nature for nature‐based solutions: The bioeconomics of forest management for wildlife, timber, and carbon2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Navigating multi-predator dynamic risk landscapes in anthropogenic environments: spatio-temporal plasticity in roe deer habitat selection2026
  3. 3Hunting and Outdoor Recreation Affect Large Herbivore Activity Patterns More Than Natural Predators in a Human‐Dominated Landscape2026 · 3 citations
  4. 4A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Management Strategies for Red Deer in Denmark2024
  5. 5Temporal displacement of the mammal community in a protected area due to hunting and recreational activities2025 · 6 citations