Analysis shows TP53 expression impacts tumor progression and identifies prognostic biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting clinical relevance.
Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) is a common and aggressive liver malignancy, often diagnosed at advanced stages. Dysregulation of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene critical for cell cycle control, apoptosis, and genomic stabilityis frequently observed in LIHC; however, its prognostic value remains uncertain. Objectives: To investigate TP53 expression levels, prognostic relevance, and molecular interactions in LIHC within a broader pan-cancer context. Methods: Publicly available datasets from TCGA and GEO were analyzed. TP53 differential expression was evaluated using TIMER 2.0, GEPIA, and UALCAN. Survival analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier Plotter, GEPIA, and UALCAN. Genomic alterations were assessed through cBioPortal. Gene expression validation was conducted using GEO2R and ggplot2. Protein-protein interaction networks were constructed using STRING and GeneMANIA. Results: TP53 mRNA expression was significantly elevated in LIHC tumor tissues compared to normal liver tissues (p < 0.05). Promoter hypo-methylation was noted in tumor samples, potentially contributing to this up-regulation. Survival analysis revealed conflicting findings: Kaplan-Meier Plotter associated high TP53 expression with better prognosis (HR = 0.65, p = 0.029), whereas GEPIA and UALCAN linked high expression with poorer outcomes. Furthermore, TP53 expression positively correlated with immune cell infiltration and advanced clinical stage, suggesting a complex role in tumor progression. Conclusion: TP53 demonstrates a dual, context-dependent role in LIHC, acting as both a tumor suppressor and potential oncogenic driver. Its variable expression patterns and inconsistent prognostic associations highlight its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and support the need for further functional and clinical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amna Atia (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: