Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical analysis identifies weighted cross-entropy as superior for retinal vessel segmentation, suggesting clear trade-offs in accuracy and specificity.
Retinal vessel segmentation underpins computer-assisted screening and monitoring of ocular and systemic disease. While encoder–decoder networks such as U-Net are widely used, their behavior is strongly shaped by the training objective. This work presents a controlled empirical study of loss functions for vessel segmentation using a U-Net architecture that employs strided convolutions in the encoder, together with a consistent preprocessing pipeline based on morphological enhancement and principal component analysis. We compare cross-entropy, weighted cross-entropy, and Dice losses on the DRIVE and STARE datasets under identical settings, reporting pixel-wise and overlap-based measures to reflect both detection and spatial agreement. The configuration with weighted cross-entropy provides a balanced outcome, achieving sensitivity and accuracy of 0.873 and 0.969 on DRIVE, and 0.821 and 0.961 on STARE. Rather than proposing architectural novelty, the contribution of this study is a reproducible data-driven comparison that clarifies the trade-offs each loss imposes on recall, specificity, and boundary fidelity, offering practical guidance for selecting objectives in retinal vessel segmentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soomro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: