PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025International Journal of Surgery5 citationsOpen Access

Liver transplantation for colorectal metastasis –selection criteria, outcomes, and management recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
CWChase J. WehrleJWJerry Chih‐Wei WuMBMatthew Byrne

Key Points

  • Survival rates after liver transplantation for colorectal metastasis indicate a 5-year survival of 54%.
  • Recurrence rates for liver transplantation in non-resectable colorectal metastases stood at 52%.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis sourced from 20 studies revealed significant insights into patient quality of life.
  • Prognostic factors play a critical role in improving outcomes post-liver transplantation for colorectal metastasis.

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in systemic therapies, the prognosis for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases (nCRLM) remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as a potential curative option for select patients. This study evaluated survival outcomes, recurrence rates, prognostic factors, and quality of life (QoL) following LT for nCRLM. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed through PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies available up to 4 October 2024. Eligible studies reported survival, recurrence, or QoL following LT for nCRLM. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and RoB 2. A random-effects model pooled overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence rates. Heterogeneity and publication bias were examined using Cochran’s Q and Egger tests. Result: Out of 549 patients, 20 studies with 377 unique patients were selected. OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91%, 67%, and 54%. DFS: 65%, 38%, and 16%. Recurrence occurred in 52%. Favorable pre-transplant factors were linked to better OS. QoL varied, with fatigue, pain, and dyspnea reported post-transplantation. Conclusion: LT offers strong survival benefits in nCRLM. However, high recurrence rates highlight the need for strict selection using Oslo score and Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wehrle et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624c34fa91c937236cbcchttps://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000004018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Chemotherapy and liver transplantation versus chemotherapy alone in patients with definitively unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A prospective multicentric randomized trial (TRANSMET).2024 · 20 citations
  2. 2Outcomes of liver transplant for colorectal liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis2024 · 13 citations
  3. 3Liver Transplantation for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Europe—Results and Trends in Patient Selection2013 · 259 citations
  4. 4Liver Transplantation for the Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Patients with Cirrhosis1996 · 7,197 citations
  5. 5ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions2016 · 19,983 citations