Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study shows azacitidine maintenance improves DFS in pediatric AML, suggesting safety and efficacy of MRD-guided treatment.
Background: Relapse remains a major challenge in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly in non-transplant-eligible patients. Although hypomethylating agents, such as azacitidine, are hypothesized to target residual disease, their efficacy and safety in de novo pediatric AML maintenance therapy require validation. Procedure: In this retrospective cohort study, 78 pediatric patients with de novo AML in remission after the C-HUANAN-AML 15 protocol were stratified into azacitidine maintenance (n=27; subcutaneous 75 mg/m²/day, days 1–14/cycle for 6 cycles) or observation (n=51) groups. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was longitudinally monitored using multiparameter flow cytometry (<0.1% threshold) and PCR for fusion transcripts. Outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At a median 34.6-month follow-up, azacitidine maintenance therapy showed comparable OS (89.7% vs. 85.0%, p=0.368) and DFS (77.7% vs. 79.0%, p=0.838) to observation overall. However, intermediate-risk patients exhibited improved DFS (85.1% vs. 73.1%, p=0.305) and OS (92.9% vs. 81.6%, p=0.304). In core-binding factor-AML with baseline fusion transcripts ≥0.1%, azacitidine significantly prolonged DFS (100% vs. 62.5%, p=0.045). MRD negativity persisted in 92.6% of the azacitidine-treated patients, with one molecular relapse (0.02% blasts). Therapy was well tolerated: 40.7% had grade 2–4 myelosuppression, but all patients completed the treatment without dose reductions. Conclusions: Azacitidine maintenance is safe and is associated with sustained MRD suppression in pediatric AML, particularly in the intermediate-risk and molecularly persistent core-binding factor-AML subgroups. These findings support the use of risk-adapted MRD-guided maintenance strategies to reduce relapse and warrant validation in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yiqiao Chen (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: