Pilot study shows personalised VR improves wellbeing and pain in haemodialysis patients, indicating its potential as a supportive treatment.
Introduction Patients undergoing haemodialysis frequently experience stress, physical discomfort, depressive symptoms, and prolonged immobility during lengthy treatment sessions. Immersive virtual reality (VR) has shown promise as a non-pharmacological intervention to improve wellbeing in various clinical settings. However, no multicentre study has examined personalised immersive VR in dialysis patients. This study therefore aimed to assess the tolerability and effects of a single personalised VR session on wellbeing, pain, and physiological parameters in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Methods In this pre-post single group pilot study, 148 participants from 12 dialysis centres (10 outpatient, 2 in-hospital) were enrolled. Each patient completed one personalised 20-minute VR session, selecting from 20 immersive 360° options. Emotional wellbeing and pain were assessed before and after VR exposure, while treatment tolerance, perceived quality, and feasibility were assessed post-session. Physiological parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation) were recorded before, during, and after exposure. Results Of the 148 enrolled participants, 143 completed the intervention (mean age 62.2 ± 14.5 years; 64.9% male and 35.1% female). Wellbeing improved significantly; among participants reporting pain, scores decreased by ∼50%. Systolic blood pressure declined from 135 to 128 mmHg and diastolic from 72 to 69 mmHg during VR exposure, with heart rate decreasing from a mean of 72 to 67 bpm (p < 0.0001 for all); values returned towards baseline afterwards. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion Personalised VR was well tolerated and produced measurable psychological and physiological benefits in dialysis patients, supporting its potential as a feasible non-pharmacological adjunct to routine care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganser et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: