Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis finds complete responses in large B-cell lymphoma after glofitamab bridging and CAR-T therapy, suggesting improved outcomes.
Background: High tumor burden is associated with poor outcomes in CAR-T cell therapy. Although radiotherapy and chemotherapy are commonly used as bridging strategies, some patients fail to achieve adequate disease control. Short-course bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapy prior to CAR-T may serve as an alternative cytoreductive approach. Glofitamab, a CD20×CD3 BsAb, has shown promising activity in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), and may help secure a therapeutic window before CAR-T infusion. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 9 patients with LBCL who received glofitamab as bridging therapy before CAR-T treatment at Beijing Gobroad Hospital between January 2024 and May 2025. Histologic subtypes included: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=5), Burkitt lymphoma (n=2), mantle cell lymphoma (n=1), and high-grade B-cell lymphoma (n=1). Median age was 41 years (range, 24–75), and 89% were male. ECOG ≥2 was noted in 2 patients (22%), IPI ≥3 in 6 (67%), and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) in 5 (56%). Most patients (78%) had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy; 2 had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation, and 5 had relapsed after previous CAR-T therapy. All patients underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T manufacturing before receiving glofitamab. OS was defined from first glofitamab use to death from any cause; PFS was defined from first glofitamab to progression or death. Results: Prior to glofitamab, 7 patients had progressive disease (PD) and 2 had partial response (PR). The median number of glofitamab cycles was 2 (range, 1–9). After the first cycle, the overall response rate (ORR) was 100% (9/9), with 2 complete responses (CR, 22%). Five patients developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS); no ICANS was observed.In the second cycle (n=7), ORR remained 100%, with 1 CR (14%) and no CRS/ICANS.Third cycle (n=3): ORR was 100% with a CR rate of 33%. Disease progression occurred in two patients during cycles 6 and 9, respectively. Median time from glofitamab to second CAR-T infusion was 208 days (range, 33–307).At the time of CAR-T infusion, disease status was CR in 3, PR in 4, and PD in 2.At 3 months post-CAR-T, 7 patients were evaluable: 5 remained in remission. Among 5 patients who had failed prior CAR-T therapy, 3 achieved CR after glofitamab bridging and second CAR-T, yielding an ORR of 60%. Post-CAR-T CRS occurred in 7/9 patients (78%), all grade 1–2, with no ICANS reported.No cases of prolonged cytopenia or infection-related mortality were observed. After a median follow-up of 8.75 months, median OS and PFS were 12.46 and 5.92 months, respectively. Outcomes were similar in the subgroup of patients who underwent a second CAR-T infusion. Conclusion: Short-course CD20×CD3 BsAb therapy with glofitamab as a bridging and cytoreductive strategy before CAR-T infusion may reduce tumor burden and improve treatment feasibility in B-NHL. Further prospective validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: