Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis compares outcomes of CAR-T therapy in elderly patients with multiple myeloma and lymphomas, suggesting age alone shouldn't dictate therapy eligibility.
Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the management of relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. However, real-world data regarding its efficacy and safety in elderly patients remains less well-characterized and underrepresented in clinical trials due to presumed higher risks of toxicity, hospitalization, and other side effects. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of CAR-T therapy in adults aged 18–75 years versus those >75 years across multiple myeloma, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients using a multi-center, federated health research network. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX Research Network, comprising data from 105 healthcare organizations. Adults diagnosed with multiple myeloma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and follicular lymphoma (FL) who received CAR-T therapy were identified and included using corresponding ICD-10 codes. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on age at the time of CAR-T infusion: 18–75 years (n=3,229) and >75 years (n=525). Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to control for confounding, yielding 112 patients per cohort. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), ICU admissions, Serious adverse events (cytokine release syndrome (CRS)/immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS)), and the development of cytopenia. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, risk differences, and risk ratios were performed. Results: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, each cohort included 112 patients. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between age groups. Among patients aged 18–75 and those >75 years, males represented 60.7% and 58.0%, respectively. The majority of patients in both groups identified as White (77.7%), followed by Black or African American (8.9%), and Asian (8.9%); 80.4% of the cohorts were identified as non-Hispanic. At the end of the follow-up, overall survival was 54.4% in the (18–75) group versus 49.0% in the (>75) group (p=0.456). ICU admissions were slightly higher among older patients but were not statistically significant (18.8% vs. 14.3%, p=0.368). Additionally, CRS/ICANS (23.2% vs. 25.9%, p=0.641) and Cytopenia incidence (60.9% vs. 59.3%, p=0.855) were similar between the two cohorts (18-75 years Vs >75 years), respectively. Conclusion: In this large, real-world study of CAR-T therapy among multiple myeloma, DLBCL, and follicular lymphoma patients, older adults (>75) experienced comparable survival, disease control, and toxicity outcomes relative to their younger counterparts (18-75 years old). These findings suggest that chronological age alone should not be solely used as an inclusion criterion for CAR-T therapy and support its consideration in appropriately selected elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albliwi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: