Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 8, 2025Blood

Outcomes of myeloablative vs reduced and non-myeloablative conditioning in MRD-negative AML and ALL with ptcy-based GVHD prophylaxis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WOWilliam O’HaraUGUsama Gergis

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective analysis shows similar outcomes in MRD-negative AML and ALL with non-myeloablative conditioning, suggesting reduced toxicity with PTCY-based GVHD prophylaxis.

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare outcomes of myeloablative and non-myeloablative conditioning in MRD-negative AML and ALL.
  • Conducted a single-center retrospective study of adults with AML or ALL undergoing allo-HSCT.
  • Patients were MRD-negative and evaluated using multi-parametric flow cytometry or quantitative PCR.
  • Conditioning regimens were categorized into myeloablative, reduced intensity, and non-myeloablative.
  • Overall survival was 75.6% at 1 year and 73.8% at 4 years, with no significant difference between AML and ALL.
  • The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease was 22% at 100 days and 33% at 6 months.
  • Non-myeloablative conditioning showed comparable overall survival and GVHD outcomes to myeloablative regimens.

Cite This Study

O’Hara et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69362f604fa91c937236dd05https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-7716
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share