Climate model errors in cloud cover are reduced by 75% using machine learning and automatic tuning.
Cloud-related parameterizations remain a leading source of uncertainty in climate projections. Although machine learning holds promise for Earth system models (ESMs), many data-driven parameterizations lack interpretability, physical consistency, and smooth integration into ESMs. Here, a two-step method is presented to improve a climate model with data-driven parameterizations. First, we incorporate a physically consistent cloud cover parameterization—derived from storm-resolving simulations via symbolic regression, preserving interpretability while enhancing accuracy—into the ICON global atmospheric model. Second, we apply the gradient-free Nelder–Mead optimizer to automatically recalibrate the hybrid model against Earth observations, tuning in nested stages (2-, 7-, 30- and 365-day runs) to ensure stability and tractability. The tuned hybrid model substantially reduces long-standing biases in cloud cover—particularly over the Southern Ocean (by 75%) and subtropical stratocumulus regions (by 44%)—and remains robust under +4K surface warming. These results demonstrate that interpretable machine-learned parameterizations, paired with practical tuning, can efficiently and transparently strengthen ESM fidelity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grundner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: