Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Difference-in-difference analysis reveals no significant changes in HIV diagnoses and case-finding rates after implementing assisted HIV self-testing.
Background HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a testing strategy to reach individuals not engaged in healthcare. We evaluated ICAP’s Reaching Impact, Saturation and Epidemic Control (RISE) program’s healthcare-worker-assisted HIVST on the number of persons testing HIV-positive (PTP) and HIV case finding rate (CFR) in “hard-to-reach” members of the general population in targeted provinces in Burundi. Methods Using routine data from October 2020 to September 2023, with October-December 2021 as the scale-up quarter, we used difference-in-difference analysis to assess changes in PTP and CFR after versus before scale-up-onset in “mature” versus “less mature” provinces. Provinces were chosen to approximate more and less exposed comparison units. We performed subgroup analyses by sex and age (10-24, ≥25 years). Results HIVST averaged 1.46% (mature) and 3.07% (less mature) of pre-scale-up testing, and 13.59% (mature) and 9.84% (less mature) of post-scale-up testing. PTP trends declined more in the mature versus less mature provinces post-scale-up (−34.25, 95% CI -84.87-16.37) although this was not significant. We found no difference in the CFR change between provinces post versus pre-scale-up (0.06%, 95% CI -0.29%-0.41%). Results were robust to subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions We found no changes in PTP and CFR after RISE’s HIVST scale-up. After results were reported to implementers, they implemented strategies to better meet programmatic goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wallach et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: