PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2025Journal of Cognitive Enhancement2 citationsOpen Access

Digital Tools for Reading Success: Meta-analyses of Digital Interventions

View Full Paper
APAngela PasqualottoECEmma G. CunninghamCHClaire Holman

Key Points

  • This work evaluates digital interventions to improve reading outcomes in children under 15.
  • Conducted meta-analyses of 41 studies on poor readers and 15 studies on general readers.
  • Utilized randomized controlled and quasi-experimental designs published between 2000 and 2022.
  • Applied multilevel meta-analyses with robust variance estimation using ShinyApp.
  • Medium effect of g = 0.433 for poor readers indicating substantial literacy gains.
  • Smaller effect of g = 0.256 for general readers reflecting modest progress.
  • Effective interventions targeted reading-specific skills like decoding and comprehension, benefiting poor readers.

Abstract

Abstract This meta-analytic work, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, evaluates the efficacy of digital interventions in improving reading outcomes in children under 15 years of age. We included 41 studies ( k = 194) focused on poor readers and 15 studies ( k = 69) on general school readers, all employing randomized controlled or quasi-experimental designs published between 2000 and 2022. Multilevel meta-analyses with robust variance estimation, conducted using the open-access tool ShinyApp, revealed a medium effect for poor readers ( g = 0.433, CI = 0.3, 0.56, p < .001), corresponding to substantial literacy gains, and a smaller effect for general readers ( g = 0.256, CI = 0.08, 0.43, p = .009) reflecting more modest progress. Notably, interventions targeting reading-specific skills, such as decoding and comprehension, were effective across both groups, whereas those focused on domain-general cognitive skills, such as attention and working memory, benefited only poor readers. Results varied slightly by orthographic transparency, with numerically stronger effects in languages with simpler syllabic structures. No significant differences emerged between decoding and comprehension outcomes. These findings highlight the potential of tailored digital interventions to enhance reading—especially for children facing literacy challenges— while underscoring the need to adapt them to diverse learner and contextual characteristics to ensure scalability and cross-linguistic applicability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pasqualotto et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694019032d562116f28f6126https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-025-00336-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of Reading Interventions on Literacy Skills for Chinese Children with and Without Dyslexia: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2The Effects of Educational Technology Interventions on Literacy in Elementary School: A Meta-Analysis2024 · 20 citations
  3. 3Decoding and vocabulary improvements mediate sustained gains in reading comprehension: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent reading intervention.2026
  4. 4Decoding improvements mediate sustained gains in reading comprehension: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial of a multi-component reading intervention2025
  5. 5The Effectiveness of Technology‐Supported Learning in Improving Students' Digital Literacy—A Meta‐Analysis of 56 Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Studies2025 · 4 citations