Workshop reveals challenges and strategies for systemic change in research with Alaska Native communities, suggesting mentorship as key.
As thirteen leaders in research with Alaska Native communities, we came together in a workshop to self-define the role of boundary spanners within our cross-cultural contexts. We utilized convergence methods and participatory decision-making facilitation. Reflecting on chronic challenges and current issues of trying to do co-production of knowledge, our group discussed the boundary spanner role and how to create systemic change. We represented different career stages, gender identities, Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples, ages, backgrounds, and job positions. We wrote this paper to illustrate positive and negative aspects of this role as framed in a typical career journey. The role is often not sustainable, includes a degree of conflict and lacks support. We recognize that boundary spanners can act as enablers of boundaries. Healing is often interwoven with Indigenous and individual self-determination. Our workshop ended with the development of strategies to create systemic change through mentoring the next generation and addressing funding inequity and the cultural divide between communities and science/policy. A key concept from the workshop is the rejection of the term “boundary spanner,” because ideally, there should not be one individual doing the spanning duties, but everyone within the science/policy sphere working to dismantle boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rudolf et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: