Statistical analysis reveals prevalence of semisynthetic cannabinoids in cannabis products in Poland, suggesting legal challenges ahead.
Semisynthetic cannabinoids (SSCs) are a novel group of psychoactive substances obtained by chemical modification of phytocannabinoids such as Δ 9 ‐THC and CBD. Since 2022, their prevalence has rapidly increased on the European illicit drug market, including Poland, where they are mainly detected in cannabis‐derived products (plant material, resinous products, e‐liquids, and edibles). In this study, 1186 cannabis‐type samples seized in Poland (2022–2024) were analyzed at the IFR using GC‐MS, UHPLC‐PDA, and LC‐QTOF/MS. SSCs were found in 113 samples (9.5%), mostly in plant material and resinous products. The predominant compound was hexahydrocannabinol (HHC), consistently detected as a mixture of two epimers, with (9 R )‐HHC prevailing (typical (9 R ):(9 S ) ratio 2.0–2.8:1). In most cases, SSCs were applied to plant material with low Δ 9 ‐THC content, mainly Chemotypes II and III (approximately 60% of all cases), indicating intentional enrichment of material with limited psychoactive potential. Following legislative changes introduced in Poland in 2023, identifications of controlled SSCs decreased; however, the diversity of noncontrolled compounds increased. Co‐occurrence of multiple SSCs, their structural similarity, stereoisomerism, and limited availability or delays in obtaining certified reference standards may complicate routine analysis. Each analytical technique presents specific limitations: GC‐MS can cause degradation of acetate forms of SSCs; UHPLC‐PDA faces challenges in differentiating compounds with similar UV spectra, whereas LC‐QTOF/MS cannot fully distinguish structural or stereoisomeric forms. This study highlights the dynamic nature of the SSC market and the importance of advanced, multimethod analytical approaches for reliable identification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wrzesień‐Tokarczyk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: