Competency assessment achieved 98% pass rate in students, indicating improved confidence and patient safety through structured training.
Background Ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation (US‐PIVC) is a critical skill for resident doctors, yet standardised ultrasound training remains inconsistent in undergraduate medical curricula. This gap may compromise patient care and safety. Approach A structured, competency‐based US‐PIVC simulation training was integrated into the final‐year medical curriculum. Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE‐AIM) framework, we conducted a convergent parallel mixed‐method study. Quantitative data were collected through a validated rating scale in an end‐of‐session assessment, whereas qualitative insights were gathered via focus group discussions. Evaluation Ninety‐eight students participated in the simulation training, with students ( n = 25) and staff ( n = 4) contributing to focus group discussions. The objective competency assessment demonstrated a 98% pass rate, with 84% achieving full procedural proficiency. Thematic analysis revealed that structured US‐PIVC training significantly enhanced students' confidence and preparedness for their foundation doctor role. Participants reported a perceived reduction in dependence on senior staff and improvements in both patient safety and procedural efficacy. To ensure skill retention, key recommendations included providing ongoing practice opportunities, implementing logbook signoffs, appointing designated US skills leads, fostering collaborative partnerships and maintaining US equipment. Implications Our study highlights the need for structured, standardised US‐PIVC training to reduce variability in clinical education. The programme improved confidence, proficiency and clinical efficiency while decreasing reliance on senior staff. Embedding mandatory training, logbook signoffs and simulation realism will enhance patient safety, procedural competency and preparedness for foundation roles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: