Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study shows venetoclax improves hematological responses in acute myeloid leukemia, suggesting therapeutic drug monitoring can optimize treatment.
This study investigates the pharmacokinetic variability and exposure-response relationships of Venetoclax (VEN) in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The study was conducted in a real-world clinical setting and included 48 patients who were treated with VEN in combination with azacytidine. We found significant inter-individual variability of 68% and intra-individual variability of 39% in plasma VEN concentrations. In addition, higher VEN concentrations were associated with better hematological responses. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 17.8 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 51% and 36.4%, respectively. A comparison of the 14-day VEN and 28-day VEN protocols showed that patients benefited from longer treatment durations, which resulted in more courses being administered. Plasma concentrations in the 14-day VEN protocol were higher than in the 28-day VEN protocol (2330 + 1675 ng/mL vs. 1503 + 966 ng/mL, respectively) without an increase in toxicities. The optimal protocol would be 400 mg/14d if we consider survival as a function of the 1818ng/mL cutoff. These results highlight the importance of considering therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a strategy to optimize treatment outcomes by balancing efficacy and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osanno et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: