pilot study shows renaltec reduces uremic toxins and improves phosphorus levels in cats with chronic kidney disease.
Objectives Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with accumulation of uremic tox-ins such as indoxyl sulfate (IS) in blood and tubular epithelial cells which contributes to progression of CKD. Aim of this prospective, randomized, two-center clinical pilot study was to evaluate the effect of oral spherical carbonaceous adsorbent renaltec (PorusOne, Porus) on IS plasma concentration, progression of CKD, parameters of calcium/phosphate homeostasis (tCa, phosphorus, FGF-23), urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPC) and fecal dysbiosis index (FDI) in cats with stable CKD IRIS stage 2 and 3 over a 6 months period. Methods Nineteen cats with CKD were randomly assigned to the renaltec group (n = 10, 8 stage 2, 2 stage 3) or control group (n = 9, 8 stage 2, 1 stage 3). All cats received standard of care treatment according to IRIS Guidelines. Cats of the renaltec group received in addi-tion 500 mg renaltec administered mixed with food or a liquid cat treat q24h. All cats were examined on day 0 (t0), after 3 months (t1) and after 6 months (t2). Statistical analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed models. Results On t0, renaltec group cats had significantly lower tCa (P = 0.026) than control group cats. On t1, there were no differences between groups, while on t2, renaltec group cats had significantly lower IS (P = 0.045) and UPC (P = 0.001) than cats of the control group. Progression of CKD was noted in 2 cats of each group. Renaltec group cats had a significantly lower FDI on t2 compared to t1 (P = 0.023) and t0 (P = 0.009). Conclusion and relevance Administration of renaltec over 6 months mitigated parame-ters associated with CKD progression. Given the pilot nature of the study, the results should be interpreted cautiously and explored further in subsequent research
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elzenbeck et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: