Numerical analysis reveals secondary flows influence hydrogen compressor performance in energy systems, suggesting areas for improvement.
Hydrogen pipeline compression is essential for H2 transportation, with low molecular mass limiting achievable pressure ratios. Existing meanline-based studies offer little guidance on 3D-geometry generation, while existing CFD analyses provide limited insight into secondary flows, loss mechanisms, and off-design behavior. An in-house tool combining meanline, streamline-curvature, and genetic algorithms generates CAD-ready geometries, analyzed with steady 3D CFD from surge to choke. In the absence of H2 experimental data, validation on an air compressor showed CFD errors of 1% in pressure ratio and 2% in isentropic efficiency. Simulations of the H2 compressor reveal that tip-leakage vortices dominate rotor-exit nonuniformity and mixing losses. Two potential stall triggers are identified: (1) incidence-induced separation at the leading-edge hub corner; (2) vaneless diffuser rotating stall, as hub separation tendencies seem connected to reduced static-pressure recovery. However, a deeper characterization would require advanced unsteady schemes. At choke onset, the incidence reaches −10°, and the relative Mach number at the leading-edge tip is 0.63, indicating a subsonic negative-incidence stall rather than sonic choking. A meanline loss breakdown analysis corroborates CFD by showing that mixing losses and skin friction prevail. Design-improvement areas have been identified to enhance the performance of hydrogen compressors for future energy systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: