Field experiment shows biochar and PAM enhance root growth and grain yield in rice under improved irrigation practices.
Introduction Efficient water use while maintaining rice productivity remains a major challenge amid declining water resources. Biochar with large surface area and hydrophilic polymers, such as anionic polyacrylamide (PAM), can enhance soil moisture and nutrient retention. However, their combined effects on rice growth and soil hydro-physical properties have not been fully explored. Methods This study evaluated the influence of biochar and PAM on soil properties, water retention, root growth, and rice performance under two establishment methods: the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Conventional Method (CM). A two-year field experiment was conducted on sandy clay loam soil using a split-plot design with SRI and CM as main plots and six soil amendment treatments (control, biochar, and polymer) as subplots, replicated thrice. Results and discussion Results showed that SRI produced 15% higher grain yield while using 28.2% less irrigation water compared with CM. SRI also improved soil moisture (SM) content, infiltration rate (IR), hydraulic conductivity (HC), and water productivity (WP) by 6.6%, 64 5.4%, 9.0%, and 46.5%, respectively. Root length and weight densities under SRI were 1.31 and 1.62 times higher than under CM. The application of biochar (10 t ha⁻¹) and PAM (10 kg 66 ha⁻¹) significantly enhanced soil physical attributes, resulting in 1.22 and 1.27 times increases in grain yield and root length density, respectively, over the control. Integrating biochar and polymer with SRI reduced irrigation water use by 39.45% compared with CM. Overall, the combination of biochar (10 t ha⁻¹) and PAM (10 kg ha⁻¹) under SRI effectively improved soil hydro-physical properties, root development, water productivity, and rice yield in the sub-humid tropical Inceptisols of northern India.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: