Precision measurement of Q values for double beta decay in Sn isotopes, suggesting implications for nuclear matrix elements.
We have determined the decay energy ( Q value) of the double beta decay of ¹²² 122 Sn with the JYFLTRAP double Penning trap mass spectrometer using the Phase-Imaging Ion Cyclotron Resonance technique. Our new Q value, 373.58(12) keV, agrees with the literature value but is 20 times more precise. We also measured the Q value for the double beta decay of ¹²⁴ 124 Sn with unprecedented precision, 2293.542(83) keV. The Q values of ¹²² 122 Sn and ¹²⁴ 124 Sn were used to calculate precisely the phase-space factors for the neutrinoless double beta ( 0ν β β 0 ν β β ) decay mode of these nuclei. With the phase-space factor and our computed nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) we predict the 0ν β β 0 ν β β -decay half-life of ¹²² 122 Sn based on the recently extracted upper limit of the effective neutrino mass by the KamLAND-Zen experiment. We used three nuclear-structure frameworks to compute the NMEs, namely the proton-neutron quasiparticle random-phase approximation (pnQRPA), the microscopic interacting boson model (IBM-2), and a hybrid model exploiting both the pnQRPA and the nuclear shell model (NSM). We find that including the short-range components enhances the total NME in the IBM-2 model, making it significantly larger than the NMEs calculated with the pnQRPA and hybrid models. Nevertheless, for all models, the obtained half-lives are very long for ¹²² 122 Sn ( ≈ 10²⁷ ≈ 10 27 – 10²⁹ 10 29 years), making the observation of 0ν β β 0 ν β β decay of ¹²² 122 Sn experimentally challenging. On the other hand, the hybrid-model calculated value of the NME for ¹²⁴ 124 Sn goes, interestingly enough, toward those previously computed by the NSM and the ab initio model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kauppinen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: