PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 11, 2025Blood Advances7 citationsOpen Access

Benefit of Rituximab Maintenance After First-line Bendamustine-Rituximab in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

View Full Paper
YWYucai WangMLMelissa C. LarsonSHSteven R. Hwang

Key Points

  • To examine the benefit of rituximab maintenance after first-line bendamustine-rituximab in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
  • Large retrospective study conducted at 27 US and Canadian academic centers
  • Total of 911 patients received first-line bendamustine-rituximab between 2010-2020
  • 394 patients received rituximab maintenance while 309 did not
  • Rituximab maintenance was associated with improved event-free survival (median 49.9 vs 29.7 months, P < 0.001)
  • Overall survival was also improved with rituximab maintenance (median 109.5 vs 74.2 months, P < 0.001)
  • Survival benefits were consistent across most subgroups, especially in patients achieving complete response.

Abstract

The benefit of rituximab maintenance after first-line (1L) bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains uncertain, with inconsistent results from the phase 2 MAINTAIN trial and several retrospective studies. We conducted a large retrospective study at 27 US and Canadian academic centers to examine the benefit of rituximab maintenance after BR. A total of 911 patients received 1L BR between 2010-2020, and 703 had an objective response and no evidence of disease progression at the 3-month post-BR landmark. Among those, 394 (56%) received rituximab maintenance and 309 (44%) did not, with largely similar baseline patient and disease characteristics. In the landmark analysis, rituximab maintenance was associated with improved event-free survival (EFS, median 49.9 vs 29.7 months, P 0.001) as well as overall survival (OS, median 109.5 vs 74.2 months, P 0.001). The EFS and OS benefits were observed across most of the subgroups. EFS and OS differences were statistically significant in those who achieved a complete response to 1L BR (n=590; median EFS 62.7 vs 31.1 months, P 0.001; median OS 136.1 vs 75.3 months, P 0.001), but the analysis in those who achieved a partial response to 1L BR was limited by the small sample size. These results provide additional evidence for the survival benefit of rituximab maintenance after BR in MCL and support its use in clinical trial design and routine practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401b1e2d562116f28f76ddhttps://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018527
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper