Randomized trial investigates rituximab's impact on survival in younger mantle cell lymphoma patients, suggesting improved outcomes.
The TRIANGLE trial established an ibrutinib-containing therapy without autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as the new standard for younger, treatment-naïve patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, the benefit of rituximab maintenance (RM) within this novel standard is unclear. We investigated whether RM improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with acceptable toxicity when added to the experimental arms of TRIANGLE. This secondary analysis of TRIANGLE included patients randomly assigned to ibrutinib-containing therapy without (I) or with (A + I) ASCT who responded to induction/ASCT. RM was given per national and center practice. PFS and OS of patients with and without RM were compared with inverse probability of treatment weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Among responders after induction/ASCT (I: 274; A + I: 237), RM was given to 61% (I) and 64% (A + I). RM prolonged PFS in ibrutinib-containing treatment arms (I: log-rank test: P = .003, 4-year PFS probability RM v no RM, 85% v 73%; A + I: P < .001, 90% v 75%). There were trends toward prolonged OS in RM groups. RM groups were at higher risk of grade 3 to 5 infectious toxicity (I: 34% v 11%; A + I: 41% v 18%). Our findings support adding RM to BTK inhibitor treatments in younger, untreated patients with MCL to achieve prolonged remission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ladetto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: