In vitro analysis showed lentinan inhibits stemness in colorectal cancer, suggesting new therapeutic potential.
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in the global cancer incidence rate worldwide. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are key drivers of CRC recurrence, metastasis, and therapy resistance, while therapies against them remain limited. Lentinan is widely recognized for its strong immune-enhancing and broad-spectrum directly antitumor activities, however, whether it has potential for cancer stemness remains unknown. Methods The CRC cell lines HCT116 and SW620 were selected for pharmacodynamic investigation. Furthermore, tumor sphere formation and limiting dilution assays were used to assess the impact of SLNT on stemness of CRC. Using cell sorting alongside cluster of differentiation 133 (CD133) knockdown and overexpression experiments, the key molecular targets of SLNT in exerting anti-CRC effects were identified. To further elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism, we performed localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA), and molecular docking simulations. Additionally, western blot analysis was conducted to validate the key signaling molecules involved. Results Our results demonstrated that lentinan significantly suppressed the proliferation and stemness of CRC cell lines HCT116 and SW620. We identified CD133 as a critical functional target and confirmed a direct binding interaction between lentinan and CD133. Finally, we revealed that lentinan suppresses stemness by inhibiting the CD133/ phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase 85 kDa regulatory subunit (p85)/ phosphorylated AKT serine/threonine kinase (p-AKT) signaling axis in CRC. Conclusion Our findings not only shed new light on the anti-tumor mechanism of lentinan, highlighting the scientific potential of natural polysaccharides in cancer treatment, but also offers new options for the clinical drug therapy of CRC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: