Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review proposes a novel endotype-to-care framework for chronic inflammation, highlighting biomarkers and targeted interventions that enhance precision and equity in care.
Background/Objectives: Chronic inflammation arises from self-reinforcing immune–metabolic circuits encompassing pattern-recognition signaling, inflammasome activation, cytokine networks, immunometabolic reprogramming, barrier–microbiome disruption, cellular senescence, and neuro–immune–endocrine crosstalk. This review synthesizes these mechanistic axes across diseases and introduces an operational endotype-to-care framework designed to translate mechanistic insights into precision-based, scalable, and equitable interventions. Methods: A narrative, mechanism-focused review was performed, integrating recent literature on immune–metabolic circuits, including pattern-recognition receptors, inflammasome pathways, cytokine modules, metabolic reprogramming, barrier–microbiome dynamics, senescence, and neuro–immune–endocrine signaling. Validated, low-cost screening biomarkers (hs-CRP, NLR, fibrinogen) were mapped to phenotype-guided endotyping panels and corresponding therapeutic modules, with explicit monitoring targets. Results: We present a stepwise, pragmatic pathway progressing from broad inflammatory screening to phenotype-specific endotyping (e.g., IL-6/TNF for metaflammation; ISG/IFN for autoimmunity; IL-23/17 for neutrophilic disease; IL-1β/NLRP3 or urate for crystal-driven inflammation; permeability markers for barrier–dysbiosis). Each module is paired with targeted interventions and prespecified treat-to-target outcomes: for example, achieving a reduction in hs-CRP (e.g., ~40%) within 8–12 weeks is used here as a pragmatic operational benchmark rather than a validated clinical threshold. Where feasible, cytokine and multi-omic panels further refine classification and prognostication. A tiered implementation model (essential, expanded, comprehensive) ensures adaptability and equity across clinical resource levels. Conclusions: Distinct from prior narrative reviews, this framework defines numeric triage thresholds, minimal endotype panels, and objective monitoring criteria that make chronic inflammation management operationalizable in real-world settings. It embeds principles of precision, equity, and stewardship, supporting iterative, evidence-driven implementation across diverse healthcare environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria E. Ramos‐Niño (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: