Proposed framework enhances collaborative perception in autonomous driving, reducing communication costs while maintaining detection accuracy.
Collaborative perception can mitigate occlusion and range limitations in autonomous driving, but deployment remains constrained by strict bandwidth budgets and heterogeneous agent stacks. We propose a communication-efficient and backbone-agnostic framework in which each agent’s encoder is treated as a black box, and a lightweight interpreter maps its intermediate features into a canonical space. To reduce transmission cost, we integrate codebook-based compression that sends only compact discrete indices, while a prompt-guided decoder reconstructs semantically aligned features on the ego vehicle for downstream fusion. Training follows a two-phase strategy: Phase 1 jointly optimizes interpreters, prompts, and fusion components for a fixed set of agents; Phase 2 enables plug-and-play onboarding of new agents by tuning only their specific prompts. Experiments on OPV2V and OPV2VH+ show that our method consistently outperformed early-, intermediate-, and late-fusion baselines under equal or lower communication budgets. With a codebook of size 128, the proposed pipeline preserved over 95% of the uncompressed detection accuracy while reducing communication cost by more than two orders of magnitude. The model also maintained strong performance under bandwidth throttling, missing-agent scenarios, and heterogeneous sensor combinations. Compared to recent state-of-the-art methods such as PolyInter, MPDA, and PnPDA, our framework achieved higher AP while using significantly smaller message sizes. Overall, the combination of prompt-guided decoding and discrete Codebook compression provides a scalable, bandwidth-aware, and heterogeneity-resilient foundation for next-generation collaborative perception in connected autonomous vehicles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soorchaei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: