Observational study reports low incidence of hip dysplasia in infants, highlighting key risk factors and effective early treatment options.
Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a spectrum of neonatal hip abnormalities that, if not detected and treated early, may lead to long-term orthopedic sequelae. Universal ultrasound screening using Graf’s method has been proposed to improve early diagnosis, though its implementation remains heterogeneous in Italy. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the outcomes of a universal ultrasound screening program for DDH conducted in a first-level birth center in northern Italy, evaluating DDH incidence, risk factors, management outcomes, and program feasibility. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from February 2024 to October 2025 at the Ivrea birth center (Piedmont region, Italy). All consecutive live-born infants (n = 904) underwent hip ultrasound according to Graf’s method, between 0 and 11 weeks of age. Hips were classified as type I (normal), type IIa (physiologically immature), or type IIb–IV (pathological). Infants with type IIa hips were re-evaluated after 2–4 weeks; those with type IIb or worse were referred to pediatric orthopedics. Results: Of 1808 hips examined, 92% were Graf type I and 8% type IIa. After follow-up, 93% of type IIa hips matured spontaneously. Pathological DDH (Graf IIb or worse) was diagnosed in 8 infants (0.88%), of whom 75% were female; 50% had no identifiable risk factors. All affected infants were treated with harness before 12 weeks of age, with complete recovery and no late diagnoses. No infant required surgical treatment. Conclusions: Universal ultrasound screening for DDH was feasible and effective in a first-level birth center, ensuring early diagnosis and absence of late-presenting cases. These findings support universal screening as a safe and equitable approach to reduce DDH-related morbidity and align with national recommendations for standardized early detection programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ragusa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: