Research demonstrates bayesian inference effectively updates modal properties in offshore wind turbines, indicating improved model accuracy.
Offshore wind turbine support structures are in harsh and unsteady marine environments, and their dynamic characteristics could change gradually after long-term service. To better understand the status and improve remaining life estimation, it is essential to conduct in situ measurement and update the numerical models of these support structures. In this paper, the modal properties of a 5.5 MW offshore wind turbine were first identified by a widely used operational modal analysis technique, frequency-domain decomposition, given the acceleration data obtained from eight sensors located at four different heights on the tower. Then, a finite element model was created in MATLAB R2020a and a set of model parameters including scour depth, foundation stiffness, hydrodynamic added mass and damping coefficients was updated in a Bayesian inference frame. It is found that the posterior distributions of most parameters significantly differ from their prior distributions, except for the hydrodynamic added mass coefficient. The predicted natural frequencies and damping ratios with the updated parameters are close to those values identified with errors less than 2%. But relatively large differences are found when comparing some of the predicted and identified mode shape coefficients. Specifically, it is found that different combinations of the scour depth and foundation stiffness coefficient can reach very similar modal property predictions, meaning that model updating results are not unique. This research demonstrates that the Bayesian inference framework is effective in constructing a more accurate model, even when confronting the inherent challenge of non-unique parameter identifiability, as encountered with scour depth and foundation stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: