Numerical simulation reveals temperature and potential field influences on arc behavior in aluminum alloy, suggesting optimization strategies.
In this study, simulations and analyses of arc characteristics in EP (positive polarity) and EN (negative polarity) stages (including the arc polarity transition stage) of variable polarity cold metal transition (VP-CMT) during arc additive manufacturing of aluminum alloys are carried out. Temperature field, potential field, and current density distribution of arc plasma at different stages are systematically investigated by establishing a numerical model of arc heat–force coupling in combination with single-layer single-pass additive manufacturing experiments. The results indicate that the arc’s high-temperature zone in EP stage shows the wider distribution range, with enhanced heat transfer efficiency, reaching a surface temperature of up to 11,555.8 K at 2 mm from the substrate. In contrast, the arc during the EN stage demonstrates a more concentrated high-temperature zone, attributed to a more pronounced electromagnetic contraction effect, resulting in reduced heat input and a lower peak substrate temperature in comparison with EP stage. As revealed by analysis of potential and current density distribution, the arc in EP stage shows the “bell-shaped” expansion pattern with widely distributed current density, whereas the EN stage arc displays a “wrapped” contraction pattern with a more concentrated current density. The transition from EN to EP stage exhibits greater arc stability than the reverse transition. Moreover, electrode spacing significantly influences arc characteristics; a reduction in spacing leads to a more focused high-temperature zone and a substantial increase in peak current density. This study elucidates the dynamic variations in heat transfer behavior between the EP and EN stages, offering a theoretical foundation for optimizing process parameters in aluminum alloy arc additive manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: