Randomized clinical trial shows preoxygenation and nasopharyngeal airway enhance safe apnea time, suggesting clinical feasibility.
This study evaluated the safe apnea time in patients at moderate high altitude and the effect of combining a nasopharyngeal airway. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to either a preoxygenation group (Group P) or a nasopharyngeal airway group (Group N).P Group: Standard facemask preoxygenation was followed by intravenous induction with maintenance guided by bispectral index (BIS) monitoring (40-60);N Group: Building upon the P group protocol, a nasopharyngeal airway delivering 12 L/min pure oxygen for apneic oxygenation was inserted prior to laryngoscopy The primary outcome was the safe apnea time in both groups. Secondary outcomes included the maximum PetCO₂ after resumption of ventilation, hemodynamic parameters, and others.The results demonstrated that the safe apnea time in Group P was 506 (399-613) s, whereas in Group N it was prolonged to 732 (492-900) s. No significant hemodynamic differences were observed between the groups. Following resumption of ventilation, Group N exhibited a lower PetCO₂ and higher PaO₂ on arterial blood gas analysis at T3.Preoxygenation combined with apneic oxygenation via a nasopharyngeal airway extends the safeapnea time without causing adverse hemodynamic effects, offering a clinically feasible strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: